What
Affects the Gender Gap in Political Interest?
Experiment
-Two political speeches were given to subjects to read. At the top of each
speech was listed a fictitious senator name: Senator Jennifer West or
Senator Jeffrey West.
-Each
speech was followed by quiz content questions and questions about
political interest, duty and government responsiveness.
-Two topics of the speeches were employed. The first topic was about adoptions in Haiti which had a more feminine connotation. The second topic was about exports which had a more masculine connotation. Different speeches were used to find how females may respond differently to different contexts.
-Two topics of the speeches were employed. The first topic was about adoptions in Haiti which had a more feminine connotation. The second topic was about exports which had a more masculine connotation. Different speeches were used to find how females may respond differently to different contexts.
Expectations
-It
is expected that women who receive the political speech from Senator Jennifer
West will be more likely to answer quiz questions correctly and will report
higher levels of political interest.
-It
is also expected that women who receive Senator Jennifer West’s speech will
more likely report a higher sense of political duty, will be more likely to
feel that the senator represents their interests and will report that the
senator is more unique than women who received Senator Jeffrey West’s political
speech.
-It
is also expected that women who receive Senator Jennifer West's adoption
speech will be more likely to be politically interested than women who received
Senator Jennifer West's export speech.
Results
-A
change in name of the senator had no significant effect on how well the
respondents answered the content question and had no effect on their levels of
political interest.
-However,
the results suggest that the name changes had an effect on women and men’s
level of duty, feelings towards government, and if they felt that the senator
represented their interests.
Below
are a visual representation and interpretations of the significant
findings.
Table 1
These
findings show that females who received the female senator & adoption
speech treatment were more likely to report that the
senator represented their political interests than females who received the
male senator and adoption speech treatment.
Other Findings
Females
who received the female senator & export speech treatment were less
likely to report that the senator represented their
political interests than females who received the male export speech.
Males
who received the female senator & export speech treatment were less
likely to feel that the senator was unique.
Males
who received the female senator & export speech treatment were less
likely to feel that elected officials cared about what they
thought.
Gender and Context
Overall,
males and females respond differently to female political role models. We
also find that these perceptions may also be influenced by context, such as the
topic of the speech. The results suggest that women do not just respond
to a female politician just because she is a female, but respond positively if
she is a female and is also perceived as feminine. This has implications
because not only does a female role model need to be present, but the context
also needs to be considered.
Do Female Politicians Make a Difference?
Yes. The experimental results suggest that
female politicians do have an influence on women’s perception towards
politics. The results show that a small change in the name has an
effect in influencing women’s perceptions towards politics. This is
encouraging to female politicians and shows that if they put forth effort in
motivating women, that the effects can have a positive influence on women's
perceptions towards politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment